Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Inspection comparison.
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 




img
MIL-M-53008(ME)
Table I.
Examination Schedule
Quality
Characteristics
Requirement
Initial
Paragraph
Conformance
Production
2
3
4
1
MAJOR
Dimensions
x
101.
3.2
x
are not as specified.
x
102.
Parts and components are
3.2
x
not complete.
Safety is not as specified
103.
3.5
x
x
x
104.
Workmanship is not as
3.9
x
specified.
x
3.9.2.1
105.
Welding certification is
x
not furnished.
x
Parts are not inter-
3.6
106.
x
changeable.
3.4
107.
x
Material is not as
x
specified.
MINOR
201.
Treatment and painting
3.7
x
x
are not as specified.
3.8
Identification marking
x
202.
x
is not as specified.
4.6 Inspection comparison.  The Government may select kits at any time during
the initial production period and subject them to the examinations specified in
4.4.2 to determine conformance to the requirements of this specification. The
inspection will be performed by the contractor at the contractor's location and
witnessed by Government inspectors on kits selected at random from those which
have been accepted by the Government, but will not include the previously
inspected initial production kits.
4.6.1 Inspection failures  Failure of an inspection comparison kit to meet any
requirement specified herein during, and as a result of, the examination shall be
cause for rejection of the inspection comparison kit and shall be cause for
refusal by the Government to continue acceptance of initial production kits until
evidence has been provided by the contractor, at no cost to the Government, that
all deficiencies have been corrected. Any deficiencies found as a result of
inspection comparison will be considered prima facie evidence that all kits
accepted prior to the completion of inspection comparison are similarly
deficient; unless evidence to the contrary is furnished by the contractor and
such evidence is acceptable to the contracting officer.
7

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us