20210907, 10:43  #12 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
3,863 Posts 

20210924, 00:50  #14 
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
3,863 Posts 

20210924, 16:43  #16  
Feb 2017
Nowhere
11571_{8} Posts 
Quote:
I'm a bit confused by your usage "new top." [Chekov voice]The top of what?[/Chekov voice] I'm inferring the meaning "largest top term of any known 3term AP of prime numbers." Is that correct? 

20210924, 17:33  #17 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
9566_{10} Posts 
Yes. I was too excited to speak in full sentences.

20210924, 19:30  #18 
Feb 2017
Nowhere
5·997 Posts 

20210925, 16:48  #20  
Feb 2017
Nowhere
4985_{10} Posts 
Actually, you may have done better than you realize. If
a = 33*2^2939064  5606879602425*2^1290000  1 and d = 33*2^2939063  5606879602425*2^1290000, then a  d = 33*2^2939063  1. Just out of curiosity, I wrote a PariGP script to check this number for factors up to 2^28, and there were none. So, I looked up a table, and what to my wondering eyes should appear... List of primes k · 2^n − 1 for k < 300 Quote:
I don't know whether a  2*d = 5606879602425*2^1290000  1 is prime or composite. Last fiddled with by Dr Sardonicus on 20210925 at 16:49 Reason: Formatting 

20210925, 18:36  #21  
Sep 2002
Database er0rr
3,863 Posts 
Quote:
Should that not be n=1..2? And... a=5606879602425*2^12900001 and d=33*2^29390635606879602425*2^1290000 So ad is negative a+d = 33*2^2939063  1 Now I can see DrS's mistake and Serge/Ryan's ingenuity. Last fiddled with by paulunderwood on 20210925 at 19:06 

20210925, 22:32  #22 
"Serge"
Mar 2008
Phi(4,2^7658614+1)/2
2×4,783 Posts 
I usually wait for a year or two to pass, then use some old scripts and some new for those AP3 weightligting approaches.
Clearly I must give kudos to David Broadhurst  because he invented this trickery and found three hits of this kind; I'd thought of how he did it and then reengineered all of it once I saw his idea. If X and Y are some primes (and they have a big enough gcd(X+1,Y+1) ), then we can add 2YX, for which we want to have properties: a) can prove primality, b) can devise a relatively fast sieve. Because of a) and the particular choice of seeds, we cannot reach higher than 1.29M / 0.275ish bits. I am ready to run CHG if we get a very high hit near the very end. Next technical problem is to sieve deep and reasonably fast. And to satisfy this criterion it really helps to have a large array of X_{j} that have a huge common part that I can remove (in this case k*2^{1290000}1). I embrassinglyparallelize (simply separate processes) on Y_{i}. There is an interesting restriction on eligible Y_{i}, left as an thought experiment to the reader. The only input for that minipuzzle is that in array of X_{j} is that _all_ of them by prior design are 1 (mod 3). By having a good array of X[5528] and Y[154], I have >850,000 "very" raw candidates. I would rather want > 10^6 (because of probability of a random odd ~1M digit number being prime is ~1/950,000, if I got it right, did I? *) but that's what we had at the moment. I was prepared for testing all sieved pool and getting no hits; the ME was ~1. Two hits was reasonably lucky and we are not finished yet... maybe we'll get a third. I call all my specialproject sieves "EMsieve", before you ask. This proofcode simply means  there was a sieve and I wrote/tinkered it. After sieving, the value candidate list was ~51,000 to be run on Ryan's cluster. ___________ * footnote: 2YX as constructed and are not only odd (for that reason I already doubled the probability), they are also not divisible by 3 (because both X and Y are 1(mod 3) ), so I can triple the probability (these "very raw" candidates are natively presieved for 2 and 3) and then perhaps it is not so lucky that we have found two hits and is not all that unlikely that we might find third hit. 
Thread Tools  
Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
primes : 270*(1000^11)/999+1  enzocreti  enzocreti  6  20190509 12:52 
Bertrand's Theorem for Arithmetic Progression  literka  Math  0  20130601 12:42 
sieving primes in arithmetic progressions  maxal  Software  18  20101004 17:11 
nth prime number in an arithmetic progression  Unregistered  Information & Answers  1  20100404 22:06 
Arithmetic and Polynomial Progression of Primes?  drake2  Math  13  20061010 00:43 