 |
|||
|
|
|||
| ||||||||||
|
|  MIL-M-45532B
a.
Conduct a failure analysis study performing a dimensional,
physical and visual examination of the components which are
suspected to be the cause of failure or malfunction.
Evaluate and correct the applicable production processes and
b.
procedures to prevent recurrence of the same defect(s) in
future production.
c.
Examine tripod mounts, partially assembled tripod mounts and
components including components and sub-assemblies at in-
process or final assembly to insure that material containing
the same defect is purged from the inventory and not presented
to the Government for acceptance.
Submit the results of the failure analysis and the corrective
d.
actions taken to the Government for review and approval prior
to submitting a reconditioned lot or reconditioned tripod
mount for retest.
4.5.3.2 Interchangeability testing.
4.5.3.2.1 In plant.
4.5.3.2.1.1 Mounts. The contractor shall test a sample of IO mounts,
randomly selected from each month's production, for interchangeability
(see 3.2.10) using the test method specified in 4.6.1.1.1. Mounts taken
for interchangeability testing shall have been found satisfactory in all
other examinations and tests. Failure of the interchangeability test shall
cause retest or rejection of the represented lot. At the discretion of
the Government representative, an interchangeability retest may be allowed
without reconditioning the lot of mounts. Failure in the retest shall cause
rejection of the represented lot subject to reconditioning and further test
as a reconditioned lot. A sample of 20 mounts from each reconditioned lot
shall be tested using the same procedure described above.
4.5.3.2.1.2 Concurrent repair parts. The contractor shall subject
at least three parts from each inspection lot of concurrent repair parts
to the interchangeability test (see 3.2.10) using the test method specified
in 4.6.1.1.2. Failure of any part to meet the requirements shall be cause
for rejection of the represented lot of parts subject to reconditioning
and further test as a reconditioned lot. A sample of double the number
of parts used in the original test shall be tested from each reconditioned
lot using the test method specified in 4.6.1.1.2.
4.5.3.2.2 Interplant. When mounts are manufactured concurrently
by more than one contractor, each contractor shall forward monthly six
mounts, and a sufficient quantity of concurrent repair parts (if applicable)
to assemble three mounts for the interplant interchangeability test speci-
fied in 4.6.1.2 (see 6.1). The contractor will be informed of the results
of the test which indicate failure of the mounts or parts to meet prescribed
requirements.
7
|
|
Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us |
Click
here for thousands of PDF manuals