Click here to make tpub.com your Home Page

Page Title: Inspection comparison.
Back | Up | Next

Click here for thousands of PDF manuals

Google


Web
www.tpub.com

Home

   
Information Categories
.... Administration
Advancement
Aerographer
Automotive
Aviation
Construction
Diving
Draftsman
Engineering
Electronics
Food and Cooking
Logistics
Math
Medical
Music
Nuclear Fundamentals
Photography
Religion
   
   

 




img
MIL-R-52453C(ME)
Table II. Examination schedule. (Continued)
Requirement
Number
Characteristic
Paragraph
125.
Materials are not corrosion resistant or
treated to be made corrosion resistant for
the applicable storage and operating environment.
3.3.1
126.
Dissimilar metals as defined in MIL-STD-889 are
not effectively insulated from each other.
3.3.1
127.
Contractor does not have documentation
available for identification of material,
material finishes or treatments.
3.3.1
4.4.2 Operational run-in. Each item of equipment shall be serviced as required and shall be
run-in in accordance with the manufacturer's normal procedures for a period of not less than
60 minutes. One or more functional defects shall constitute failure and acceptance of the
equipment shall not be approved until all defects are corrected.
4.5 Inspection comparison. When initial production inspection is specified the Government
may select rollers at any time during the contract production period and subject these rollers to
the examination specified in 4.4.1 and the tests specified in 4.3.3 to determine conformance to
the requirements of this specification. The inspection will be performed by the Government, at a
site selected by the Government, on units selected at random from those which have been
accepted by the Government and will not include the previously inspected preproduction roller
and initial production roller. In addition to any test specified as part of the inspection
comparison, the Government reserves the right to conduct any and all other tests contained in
this specification as part of the inspection comparison and failure of such additional tests shall
have the same effect as failure of those tests specified as inspection comparison.
4.5.1 Inspection failure. Failure of an inspection comparison roller to meet any requirement
specified herein during and as a result of the examination and tests specified in 4.3.3 shall be
cause for refusal by the Government to continue acceptance of production rollers until evidence
has been provided by the contractor that corrective action has been taken to eliminate the
deficiencies. Correction of such deficiencies shall be accomplished by the contractor at no cost
to the Government on rollers previously accepted and produced under the contract. Any
deficiencies found as a result of the inspection comparison will be considered prima facie
evidence that all rollers accepted prior to the completion of inspection comparison are similarly
deficient unless evidence to the contrary is furnished by the contractor and such evidence is
acceptable to the contracting officer.
4.6 Inspection of packaging. The preservation, packing, and marking shall be examined in
accordance with the quality assurance provisions of MIL-R-3075.
16

Privacy Statement - Press Release - Copyright Information. - Contact Us

Integrated Publishing, Inc. - A (SDVOSB) Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business